data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48f9c/48f9cddc98cf141e91e54743c4406aeab04bd066" alt=""
I believe I focused more on the Christie story in the first reading, as the events of her life were newer to me as a reader then. I have since read much more about her. So this time, I see how Eames really just introduces the story of the famous mystery writer traveling alone to the Middle East and falling in love with a younger archeologist. But he did tell this story well enough to get me to read more.
In my memory, 8:55 to Baghdad was a light reading choice. I am surprised on rereading to find several very crude, sinister characters and a deep sadness about the breakdown in society and the loss of hope for some cities in Eastern Europe and Asia Minor. I had forgotten the whole "these Iraqis may die soon" aspect of the final chapters. Eames reminds us of the anxiety hanging about before the spring of 2003.
I do not often reread books other than classics like The Hobbit or The Scarlet Letter, but I can see how it can be a useful study in assessing my own memory.
Eames, Andrew. 8:55 to Baghdad. Overlook Press, 2005. ISBN 158567673X
2 comments:
I love to reread books. Actually, I think I may like rereading even more than reading the first time -- I love to see the things I missed, and the things I notice the second or eight time around that I didn't notice before, and how I react to a book at different times in my life.
I read Eames book after the autobiography of Agatha Christie. And being Viennese, I read his nex bood "Blue River,Black Sea" where he describes travelling along the Danube. Partly a travel on the traces of Patrick Leigh Fermor. So I read Fermor too... you know, one book leads to another and another and so on.
You do a great work,
regards from Vienna,
Doris
Post a Comment